Friday, November 5, 2010

A Presentation Driven by Emotions


                           Seismology: A Physical Approach
                                           Sympson Placide
                                                
                                                 Abstract
The importance of seismology will be discussed. The physical models for seismic source will be described, and the actual source parameters will be presented including the relationship between the parameters. The effect of earthquakes on the ground will be covered along with the engineering aspects.
                                              Introduction
Seismology is the study of earthquakes and seismic waves. According to the United States Geological Survey, earthquakes have caused 600,000 fatalities around the world from the year 2000 to 2010. The time of occurance, the locality, and the strength still need to be usefully predicted in order to minimize loss from natural disaster. In the common treatment of earthquakes, it's assumed that the motion has a specific beginning and a definite origin (Scheidegger 12). It can only be studied by using mathematical models and physical models. Physical relationship will be discussed for the seismic source models. The mathematical relationship between parameters will be presented. A superficial look at the effect of seismic waves on the ground, and the engineering aspects will be taken into consideration. Energy will be expressed in ergs.
1. Seismic source model
As shown in figure 1 below, an earthquake is usually represented by a focus that has a specific location and becomes activated at a particular time. It is mentioned the physical process might occur at such focus, and it's the cause of the seismic wave patterns noted. It's not easy to understand the physics of the seismic source. The attempts at understanding it rely on mathematical model and physical models. In this model, the focus is located near 600 km below earth (Scheidegger 13-17). Here is a link of a compatible figure below.
  http://www.yorku.ca/esse/veo/earth/image/1-10-15.JPG
Figure 1: Physical representation of seismic source

2. Source Parameters
Three parameters: magnitude, energy, and volume are more universally significant. It's arduous to determine the energy radiated by an earthquake. As a result, relative to the focal process, a characterization of the strength, magnitude, was determined empirically. It was defined by Richter. Only the maximum amplitude of a seismic record is considered. The relation between the magnitudes M of earthquakes at standard epicentral distance of 100 Km, and the maximum recorder trace amplitude B (mm) is given by:
    M1-M2=logB1-logB2                        (1)
For the validity of the relation (1), the seismogram is supposed to have been recorded on a standard torsion seismometer of free period 0.8 sec, static instrumental magnification of 28000 and damping ratio of 50: 1. The zero of the scale is defined by setting M=3 for B=1mm. As remarked, the magnitude depends on a particular type of instrument (Scheidegger 17-19).

It's very difficult to observe the amount of energy radiated by an earthquake, so for study purpose one has to calculate the energy emitted by the earthquake source in elastic waves from the energy flux passing through a seismic station. A good summary of the procedures has been given by Bath with the energy measured in ergs. As energy- class K of an earthquake one has designated the power of 10 of the number of ergs released:
    K=logE (ergs)                            (2)
The relation between the energy and various magnitude scales is as follows
    log E=α +βM (3)
Where α and β are empirical coefficients. It can only be an approximation (Scheidegger 19).

The volume is the region at the vicinity of the focus in which the elasticity conditions no longer apply. Bath and Duda identified the earthquake volume with the total volume occupied by the "aftershocks". By this simple procedure, it is found there is direct relationship between the three parameters. The volume increases with magnitude as does the energy (Scheidegger 21).

3. Effect on the ground
The motion of the ground is a quasi-oscillatory motion (Scheidegger 23-32). An important aspect of analysis of early records of earthquakes was the first arrival of the P-wave. It's known as the first vertical motion (Brumbaugh 87). It is deduced to be one of the causes of building being toppled over. The motion of the ground is the result of the impingement of elastic waves (Scheidegger 23).

4. Engineering aspects
The right type of foundation for a site condition is vital in order to minimize the damage (Brumbaugh 215-216). For instance, Pier or Caisson pile foundation must be used for tall and heavy building instead of mat foundation that are used in apartment in the United States. The length of duration of a potential earthquake must be taken into consideration while building to resist earthquake (Scheidegger 32-34). It's found that ground Oscillation acts through their velocities at frequencies above the frequency of a building that usually range between 2 Hz to 8 Hz (Scheidegger 33).

5-Conclusion
Naïve physical and mathematical models were presented for the seismic source, the source parameters. The effect on the ground of the physical process that occurs at a focus below the ground was discussed including the actual engineering application of the known facts about seisms. A more complex model that can usefully predict the time of occurance, the locality, and the strength is needed to fight seisms in modern days.


                                                    References

Brumbaugh, Earthquakes Science and Society, Prentice hall, Inc. 1999.Scheidegger, Physical Aspects of Natural Catastrophes, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1975.


















Friday, October 8, 2010

TODAY IS NOT TOMORROW

     Talking, criticizing, ignoring, mocking, discriminating, and dominating will not make possible that ideal tomorrow for Haiti. I always remember my freshman year in college taking calculus for engineers. That experience is a good example to make an analogy. These classes are analytical.They have a reputation of being complicated ; therefore, as a novice, I always ended up over-thinking simple problems that did not require that much thinking to solve. It's exactly the same scenario that I have observed concerning Haiti.Problems are too simple;as a result, everyone is too intelligent to solve them. It's obvious that replacing traditional ways of handling problems by new ways will definitely give us that tomorrow. We,concerned individuals, must replace all those talks by acting heart and soul. Replace blames by taking initiative to set an example no matter what is usually seen as an obstacle on our way. ( Someone has to do it first anyway.) Replace ignorance for self-interest by caring for common interest. Replace discrimination by creating opportunities for education.Finally for my point, Replace domination by  learning to control your animal instinct.
     If the majority of concerned individuals understand the problems are that simple, all hypocrites and exploiters would either unite for the betterment of Haiti or vanish. ( I would prefer them to take conscience and choose to unite instead of vanishing.) In order for the majority of concerned individuals to understand the simplicity of the problems, they have to have the opportunities to break out for themselves from those hypocrites and exploiters'cages. The first step is through the spirit of unity where each one of us willfully volunteers to do our part  whether by creating opportunities or make your resources available whatever obstacles on the way.(once again, keep remembering someone has to do it first to set an example.) One does not have to have those traditional titles like a politician, a missionary, an opportunist.(Anyway, there are a lot of hypocrites and exploiters using those titles. ) All that's needed is an honest look at our hurtful  actions that led to the big mess. As a tired native who knows just a little based on observation and personal experience growing up in and out of Haiti, I am certain today is not tomorrow. I promise to do my part as one concerned individual while seeking to become a better human. By becoming a better human myself, I will be able to do more as a global citizen who is tired of most of the traditional ideologies and the helpless friends who are solely talking, blaming, ignoring, mocking, discriminating and dominating.Once again, today is not tomorrow. That is all one knows for now.